![]() ![]() Twitter briefly blocked links to the story for potentially containing hacked material and Facebook briefly restricted it as possible “misinformation” - but it may have been neither. Some decisions and claims look dubious in retrospect. So, nearly a year and a half later, it’s worth revisiting what happened back in the heat of the 2020 campaign. Technically, the Times only vouched for certain emails they’d “authenticated” with the help of “people familiar with them and with the investigation.” But the Times reporters also said the cache of files “appears” to have come from a laptop Hunter abandoned at a computer shop - leaning toward, without quite endorsing, a long-questioned account of how the material got out. “The Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real,” the New York Post editorial board crowed. Now, conservatives interpreted last week’s Times report as a belated concession that the leaked material was authentic, and they’re taking a victory lap. The mainstream media generally treated the material with caution - and, perhaps most controversially of all, Twitter and Facebook blocked or restricted links to the Post’s story. Democrats and their allies cried foul, arguing that the materials may have been faked, stolen, or leaked as part of a foreign interference campaign akin to the Russian government’s hacking and leaks of Democratic emails in 2016. ![]() ![]() Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani gave those files to the New York Post, and they circulated to other conservative outlets too, resulting in negative stories about Hunter Biden’s business and personal life. This is a reference to a controversial “October surprise” that came out just before the 2020 election. And that report cites emails that, per the Times, are “from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. The president’s son remains under investigation for matters related to tax payments and his foreign work, the New York Times reported last week. The letter was first reported by the Washington Examiner.Hunter Biden’s laptop has returned to the discourse. Trump, who has railed against the dossier for years, released a statement celebrating the agreement and once again slamming the dossier as “a Hoax funded by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign.”Ī DNC spokesperson played down the decision, saying: “We settled aging and silly complaints from the 2016 election about ‘purpose descriptions’ in our FEC report.” The lawyer representing both the campaign and the DNC did not immediately respond to a request for comment. ![]() A special counsel assigned to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia probe charged one of Steele’s sources with lying to the FBI and charged a cybersecurity lawyer who worked for Clinton’s campaign with lying to the FBI during a 2016 meeting in which he relayed concerns about the Russia-based Alfa Bank. Documents have shown the FBI invested significant resources attempting to corroborate the dossier and relied substantially on it to obtain surveillance warrants targeting former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.īut the dossier has been largely discredited since its publication, with core aspects of the material exposed as unsupported and unproven rumors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |